Peer reviewers have the right to provide some feedback to authors to encourage the quality of published manuscripts and editors for editorial policy decision making according to their respective expertise.

Willingness

Peer reviewers should inform the editor of their willingness to review a manuscript for publication. If they are unwilling, they should notify the editor.

Confidentiality

The manuscript under review is a confidential document. Communication with other parties without the author's permission is prohibited.

Standard objectivity

Peer reviewers should be based on the principles of objectivity and avoid personal criticism of manuscript authors during the review process. All comments should be accompanied by clear and supportive suggestions.

Clarity References

MPeer reviewers are encouraged to provide authors of research with information on relevant uncited literature, or case studies, that have substantial similarity or overlap with the manuscript under review.

Conflict of interest

• Peer reviewers are not permitted to use unpublished manuscript materials for personal use without the written consent of the author, under any circumstances.
• The information and ideas contained in the reviewed manuscript are confidential and must not be distributed or used for personal advantage.
• If having a conflict of interest due to competitive, collaborative, or other relationships with the authors, institutions or companies involved in the publication, peer reviewers are not permitted to evaluate the related manuscript.