Integration of Gender, Disability, and Social Inclusion Principles in Merdeka Curriculum English Textbooks

Penulis

  • Yuliana Dg Macora Sintuwu Maroso University
  • Novalita Fransisca Tungka Sintuwu Maroso University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.71127/2829-9426.784

Kata Kunci:

Gender, Disability, Sosial Inclusion, English Textbook, Merdeka Curriculum

Abstrak

This study aims to explain how the interaction between images and texts constructs meanings related to gender equality, disability, and social inclusion (GEDSI) in English textbooks for Senior High School/Islamic Senior High school (SMA/MA) of the Merdeka Curriculum, for instance Life Today and Train of Thoughts. A mixed-methods explanatory sequential design was applied by combining quantitative and qualitative data. The data of GEDSI-oriented are analyzed by using Visual Grammar theory of Kress and van Leeuwen (2020). The findings reveal that the English textbooks partially reflect GEDSI principles. While the visual representations demonstrate some awareness of gender and disability inclusion. They predominantly reproduce traditional gender roles, such as female character are still more strongly associated with domestic and caregiving roles, while male characters are positioned lie outside the home, and present disability as marginal rather than integral to the narratives. As a result, although the textbooks include certain inclusive elements, their multimodal design provides only limited opportunities for senior high school students to develop a critical understanding of GEDSI-related issues.

Biografi Penulis

Yuliana Dg Macora, Sintuwu Maroso University

English Language Education Department

Referensi

Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational Research Planning, Conducting, and Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative Research (4th ed.). Pearson Education, Inc.

Fithriani, R. (2023). Gender Portrayals in Indonesian and International English Language Textbooks for Primary Students: A Critical Image Analysis. Mextesol Journal, 46(4), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.61871/mj.v46n4-12

Fitriana, W., & Wirza, Y. (2021). An Analysis of Multimodal Text in EFL Textbook of Secondary School in Indonesia in Assisting Students’ Text Understanding.

Handayani, D. E., & Tungka, N. F. (2023). The Representation of Gender Equality in The Illustration of English Textbooks for Senior High School. 23(2), 2580–5886. https://doi.org/10.30996/parafrase.v23i2.9233

Horvat, S. A., RonÄević, T. N., Bogdanović, I. Z., & Rodić, D. D. (2023). Differences in Graphic Illustrations in the Contents of Natural Sciences in Regular Textbooks and Textbooks for Students with Special Educational Needs in the Republic of Serbia. SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY EDUCATION: NEW DEVELOPMENTS AND INNOVATIONS, 88–98. https://doi.org/10.33225/BalticSTE/2023.88

Ibda, H., & Wijanarko, A. G. (2023). Pendidikan Inklusi berbasis GEDSI (Gender Equality, Disability and Social Inclusion). Mata Kata Inspirasi.

Kress, G. (2010). Multimodality: A Social Semiotic Approach to Contemporary Communication. Routledge.

Kress, G., & van Leeuwen, T. (2020). Reading Images. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003099857

Lai, H. (2018). Image-text relations in junior high school EFL textbooks in China: A mixed-methods study. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 9(6), 1177–1190. https://doi.org/10.17507/jltr.0906.07

Miles, M. B., Huberman, M. A., & Saldana, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis : a methods sourcebook. SAGE Publications.

Qi, J. (2024). Analyzing Image Meanings in Chinese EFL Textbooks: A Multimodal Perspective. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 14(8), 2498–2509. https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1408.23

UNESCO. (2009). Promoting Gender Equality in Education. In UNESCO Bangkok (4th ed., Vol. 6). UNESCO Asia and Pacific Regional Bureau for Education. https://www.kiat.or.id/resx/upload/GEDSI/GEDSI_Implementation_in_Water_Ut.pdf

Yumarnamto, M., Widyaningrum, A. Y., & Prijambodo, V. L. (2020). Identity and Imagined Communities in English Textbooks Illustrations. LEARN Journal : Language Education and Acquisition Research Network Journal, 13(2). https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1258604.pdf

Diterbitkan

2025-08-12