The Students’ Creativity Level at Technical Department of Polimarin

Deri Herdawan

Abstract

There are many factors affecting the learning outcomes of education, one of which being creativity. The present research examined the students’ creativity level at technical department of Politeknik Maritim Negeri Indonesia. This descriptive research implemented the purposive sampling technique, involving 48 students as research subjects. A test consisting of 10 items to measure creativity was assigned to them. The data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and subsequently used to categorize the students based on their creativity level. The results revealed that the students had different creativity level (majorly high creativity in third semester students and low creativity in first semester students). Further details were elaborated and their relevance with teaching method selection was discussed. Future research should investigate how creativity interacts with certain teaching methods and moderates the learning outcomes.

Keywords

education; creativity level; teaching method;

Full Text:

PDF

References

Article 31 Paragraph 4 of The 1945 Constitution. https://luk.staff.ugm.ac.id/atur/UUD45-Ubah4.pdf

Boekaerts, M. (1996). Personality and the Psychology of Learning. European Journal of Personality, 10(5), 377–404.

Dornyei, Z. (2005). The Psychology of the Language Learner: Individual Differences in Second Language Acquisition. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Ghufron, M. A. (2015). The Effect of Collaborative Writing Technique in Teaching Argumentative Essay Writing Viewed From the Students’ Creativity. Language Circle : Journal of Language and Literature, 10(1), 49–60.

Gregory, R. J. (2013). Psychological testing: History, principles, and applications (7th ed.). Pearson Education ESL.

Herdawan, D. (2015). The Effectiveness of Information Gap Activity to Teach Speaking Viewed from Students’ Creativity. Jurnal Tadris Bahasa Inggris, 8(1), 103–118.

Laal, M., & Ghodsi, S. M. (2012). Benefits of collaborative learning. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 31(2011), 486–490. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.12.091

Masyhudianti, U. K., Sutomo, N., & Suparno, S. (2018). The effectiveness of Schoology to teach writing viewed from students’ creativity. International Online Journal of Education and Teaching (IOJET), 5(4), 943–955.

Munandar, S. C. . (1977). Creativity and education: A study of the relationships between measures of creative thinking and a number of educational variables in Indonesian primary and junior secondary schools.

Munyaradzi, E. (2016). Teaching Methods and Students’ Academic Performance. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science Invention, 2(9), 29–35.

Noviyanti, T. (2016). The Impact of Creativity on the Implementation of Role Play Activity in Teaching Speaking [Lampung University]. digilib.unila.ac.id/29313/

Permendikbudristek Number 56 of 2022. https://jdih.kemdikbud.go.id/sjdih/siperpu/dokumen/salinan/salinan_20220215_093900_Salinan Kepmendikbudristek No.56 ttg Pedoman Penerapan Kurikulum.pdf

Smaldino, S. E., Lowther, D. L., & Mims, C. (2019). Instructional Media and Technology for Learning (Vol. 12). Pearson.

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.