The Level of Students’ Metacognitive Reading Strategy Awareness

Yulvita Christanti Pelaro, Sherliane Trisye Poai

Abstract

The objective of the research is to find out the level of students’ metacognitive reading strategy awareness in English language study Program of Sintuwu Maroso Poso. The type of the research is quantitative research. The role of the researcher was the observer. The location of the research in Teacher and Education Faculty of Sintuwu Maroso University on Jalan P. Timor No. 1 Poso. The Source of the research all of the fifth and seventh semester students at English Department of Sintuwu Maroso University consist of 30 students. The technique of data collection used is questionnaire. The questioner adopted from Mochtari and Reicahrd (2002). The questionnaire sent to the students in Google form. The finding of the research obtained that the level of students’ metacognitive reading strategy awareness is high with the mean score of 3,7. The score means that the students usually uses the metacognitive strategy when reading the English text. The Metacognitive strategy Awareness consist of three strategy namely Global strategy, supporting strategy and problem solving strategy

Keywords

Metacognitive Strategy: Reading Comprehension

Full Text:

PDF

References

Abbott, ESL reading strategies: Differences in Arabic and Mandarin speaker test performance. Language Learning, 56, pg.637

Al Melhi, A. M. (2000). Analysis of Saudi college students© reported and actual reading strategies along with their metacognitive awareness as they read in English as a foreign language. Dissertation Abstracts International.

Alsheikh, Negmeldin O, and Mokhtari, Kouider, 2011. An examination of the metacognitive reading strategies used by native speakers of Arabic when reading in English and Arabic.

https://scholarworks.uttyler.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1022&context=education_fac

Anderson, N. J. 2003. Scrolling, Clicking, and Searching English: Online Reading Strategies in a Second/Foreign Language. The Reading Matrix.

Andria Yourn and Jane D. Fry 2008. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, Vol. 8, No. 2, May 2008, pp. 1 -10.

Baker, L. 2002. Metacognition in comprehension instruction. In C. Block & M.

Brewster, J & Ellis, G. (2002). The Primary English Teacher’s Guide. Edinburgh ate: Pearson.

Brown, H. Douglas.2000.Teaching by Principles an Interactive Approach to Language Pedagogy. San Fransisco: San Fransisco State University.

C.R. Kothari., Research Methodology Methods and Techniques Second Revised Edition, (India:University of Rajasthan Jaipur, 2004)

Dalman,2013. Ketermpilan Membaca. Keterampilan Membaca. Jakarta: PT. Raja Grafindo Persada

Flavell, J. H. 1976. Metacognitive aspects of problem solving. In L. B. Resnick (Ed.), The nature of intelligence. Hillsdale, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Flavell, J. H. 1979. Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive- developmental inquiry.

Farida Rahim, 2005 Pengajaran Membaca di Sekolah Dasar, Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

Heru Astikasari Setya Murti, 2011. Metakognisi dan Theory of Mind (tom), Jurnal Psikologi Pitutur, Vol. 1, No. 2, Jni 2011, Hal 53

Iskandar Wassid, Dadang Sunendar, 2011. Strategi Pembelajaran Bahasa, Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.

Jaleel Sajna & Premachandran. P. 2016. A Study on the Metacognitive Awareness of Second School Students. Universal Journal of Education Research 4(1): 165-172. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/

Kuntjojo, 2009. Kemampuan Metakognitif dan Keberhasilan Belajar Peserta didik. http://ebekunt.wordpress.com/2009/04/12

Livingstone, J. A. (1997). Metacognition: An Overview. Accessed from: http://gse.buffalo.edu/fas/shuell/cep564/metacog.htm

Margareth E. Gredler, 2011, learning and Instruction (Teori dan Aplikasi), Prenada Media Group, Jakarta.

Melby-Lervag, M., & Lervag, A. 2014. Effect of Educational Interventions Targeting Reading Comprehension and Underlying Component. Child Development Perspectives, 8(2), 96-100. https://doi.org/10.111/cdep.12068

Mokhtari and Reichard, 2002. Assessing Students’ Metacognitive Awareness of Reading Strategies. Journal ofEducational Psychology.

Oxford, R. L. (1990). Language learning strategies: What every teacher should know. Boston: Heinle & Heinle Publishers. Siska Putri Permata, Penerapan Strategi Metakognisi dalam Pembelajaran Matematika Siswa Kelas X SMA Negeri 2 Padang (Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, Vol 1 No. 1 hal 9

Samsu Somadaya, 2011. Strategi dan Teknik Pembelajaran Membaca, Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu.

Weinstein, C. E., & Underwood, V. (1985). Learning strategies. In J. Segal & S. Chipman (Eds.),Thinking and learning skills. London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates

Wulansari Ardianingsih and Rose Mini Agoes Salim, 2019. Perbedaan Gender Pada Kesadaran Metakognitif dalam Strategi Membaca Akademik. Jurnal Psikologi Teori and Terapan Agustus 2019, Vol. 10, No.1, 74-84. https://journal.unesa.ac.id/

Zhenita Deliany & Bambang Yudi Cahyono, 2020. Metacognitive Reading Strategies Awareness and Metacognitive Reading Strategies Use of EFL University Students across Gender. Studies in English Language and Education. 7(2), 421437.June 19, 2020. http://jurnal.unsyiah.ac.id/SiELE/article/view/17026

Zoltan Dornyei.2001, Teaching and Researching Motivation, first edition. Longman. London

Thomson A. J. and Martinet A. v. 1986.A Practical English Grammar. Hong Kong: oxford University Pres

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.71127/2829-9426.484

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.